Sherman Anti-trust Act

Dorito16

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Print page

The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark federal statute in the history of Unites States antitrust law passed by congress in 1890. It prohibits certain business activities that federal government regulators deem to be anti-competitive, and requires the federal government to investigate and pursue trusts. The law attempts to prevent the artificial raising of prices by restriction of trade or supply. In other words, innocent monopoly, or monopoly achieved solely by merit, is perfectly legal, but acts by a monopolist to artificially preserve his status, or nefarious dealings to create a monopoly, are not. Put it another way, it has sometimes been said that the purpose of the Sherman Act is not to protect competitors, but rather to protect competition and the competitive landscape.

http://allaboutcutting.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Sherman-Antitrust-Act.pdf

http://open.salon.com/blog/leigh_r/2010/07/06/understanding_the_spill_without_mentioning_bp

English: John Sherman

Sen. John Sherman, the principal author of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

“The purpose of the Sherman Act is not to protect business from the working of the working of the market; it is to protect the public from the failure of the market. The law directs itself not against conduct which is competitive, even severely so, but against conduct which unfairly tends to destroy competition itself. This focus of U.S. competition law, on protection of competition rather than competitors, is not necessarily the only possible focus or purpose of competition law. For example, it has also been said that competition law in the European Union tends to protect the competitors in the marketplace, even at the expense of market efficiencies and consumers.”

doc_051b_big

The Sherman Act is divided into three sections.

  • Section 1 delineates and prohibits specific means of anticompetitive conduct
  • 2 deals with end results that are anticompetitive in nature. Thus, these sections supplement each other in an effort to prevent businesses from violating the spirit of the Act, while technically remaining within the letter of the law.
  • Section 3 simply extends the provisions of Section 1 to U.S. territories and the District of Columbia.

http://www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/history/sherman-antitrust-act.html

What do you think life would be like if it weren’t for the Sherman Anti-trust Act?

I personally think that life would be much more different economy wise.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    1-Slider

    Meditation

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    1-Slider

    People Together Make Huge Differences

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    1-Slider

    When removing DACA, are we also removing the morals of Amercia?

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    American Image

    The Children Are Our Future; RRR!

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    1-Slider

    Defacing History or Respecting Citizens?

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    American Image

    1992 L.A. Riots

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    1-Slider

    A View on Learning at Gunston Hall

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    1-Slider

    What is the deal with Poverty in the U.S.A?

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    American Image

    Virginia and the birth of Party Politics in America

  • Sherman Anti-trust Act

    American Image

    Freedom and the cost of human rights in America.

Sherman Anti-trust Act